FAQ | Egypt Site | Links | Advertise | Guest Book | Free Services
Home Home Site map Site map Contact us Contact us
 
Business monthly September 02
 
LETTER FROM THE EDITOR FEATURE EXECUTIVE LIFE
VIEWPOINT REPORTS SUBSCRIPTION FORM
ROUND UP FOLLOW UP ADVERTISING RATES
YOUR ASSETS
 

REPORTS
CBE thwarts GDR arbitrage Heat wave roasts Egypt
Informal sector embraces migrants Remittances tumble with oil prices
Soccer websites look to turn a profit Tech tenants pulled two ways
US nixes additional aid

CBE thwarts GDR arbitrage

One of Egypt’s biggest problems in luring investment has always been a fear on the part of foreign investors that – should they ever wish to exit the market – they might be unable to turn their assets into hard currency. So in May, when stock-market investors started noticing severe delays in the standard repatriation process, despite earlier pledges by the Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) that it would provide them “with all of their foreign-currency needs,” they had reason to be concerned. According to one local analyst, “No one was getting any money from any transaction” from May 22 until the last week of June.

The shrewd and the skewed
In the summer of last year, to allay fears of just such an eventuality, the CBE gave assurances that foreign investors would get their returns from the stock market in dollars, calculated at the CBE’s official exchange rate on the day of the transaction. “Foreign investors governed by the Investment Law are guaranteed the convertibility of funds for repatriation,” according to a Guide for Investors in Egypt published recently by the European Commission. “The amount of hard currency available for repatriation is calculated on the basis of the current exchange rate and may be transferred in one installment if the foreign-currency account balance is sufficient to cover the amount.”
According to sources at several brokerage companies, the reason for the recent delays was a decision by the central bank to freeze its foreign-currency account, effectively preventing foreign investors from getting their hands on either their principal or their dividends. As a Beirut-based analyst who specializes in emerging markets noted, “the whole thing has been very hushed up.”
Citibank’s global securities department mentioned the problem briefly in a June 5 statement, saying that the repatriation process “was temporarily put on hold as of May 22 for review by the Central Bank of Egypt.” That single mention, issued under the headline “Repatriation situation in Egypt continues,” was tempered with the hope that the CBE would unfreeze the account in the days ahead.
While the account, apparently, was finally reopened in the last week of June, the question remains: what could have prompted such a radical move in the first place? Market observers concerned about the situation said the suspension of the account was a stop-gap attempt by the CBE to prevent currency arbitrage in the global depository receipt (GDR) market.
GDRs – receipts for stocks in local companies that are listed on major international stock exchanges – are designed to facilitate the trading of shares from abroad. There are currently nine Egyptian companies with active GDRs, all of which trade on the London Stock Exchange. These receipts pay dividends in dollars, and the system – as the exchange rate falls in or out of line with actual market demand – occasionally offers the shrewd investor “relative value opportunities,” according to emerging-market investment guru Peter Marber, author of From Third World to World Class.
Just such an opportunity presented itself in Egypt thanks to the skewed nature of the country’s official exchange rate. Investors realized that they could make a profit if they converted locally listed shares into GDRs and then converted them back into local shares, as the proceeds from the sales of these shares were being paid out at the official CBE rate of £E 4.64 to the dollar.
Returns on such transactions, then, would approximate the difference between the currency’s official rate and its black-market price vis-à-vis the dollar. The practice caught on quickly, with such cases “almost happening on a daily basis,” the local analyst said.
According to Angus Blair, head of investments at the Riyadh-based Al-Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation, a major international Islamic investment company, “arbitrage opportunities have always come and gone. But you never had external players trying to take advantage of such opportunities.” He went on to say, however, that attributing the account freeze entirely to the GDR situation is “a bit of a red herring,” hinting that perhaps the move had “more to do with wider foreign-currency issues.”
As of press time, the CBE’s governor and deputy governor were unavailable for comment.

Three-step currency shuffle
There’s nothing illegal or wrong with employing an arbitrage opportunity to make money. Indeed, a free-market assumes that if ever such opportunities arise, they will be seized – quickly. “Sophisticated players have chances frequently to extract interesting returns from inefficient markets,” Marber writes. “Often one hears of ‘arbitrage’ trades... that seep out from the developing world’s embryonic financial markets.” GDRs in particular often allow for such opportunities, Marber adds, because the overseas receipts tend to be more expensive than the underlying local shares.
In Egypt’s case, such transactions allowed local investors, ever thirsty for foreign currency, to get their hands on dollars at an unusually low – in fact, the official – rate. “Some dealers believed that the market’s value... was buoyed by investors needing dollars who bought local shares, exchanged them for GDRs, and sold them for hard currency,” read the May 26 market report in Al-Ahram Weekly.
According to Tamer Gadallah, a broker at Cairo-based brokerage firm Investia, importers were using the technique to convert large amounts of local currency into dollars. “Some big importers – who couldn’t otherwise get their hands on dollars – bought lots of local stocks, converted them into GDRs, then sold them again for foreign currency. In this scenario, of course, the CBE is the loser.” He added that several transactions were in the millions.
In effect, the arbitrage opportunity represented a three-step method for converting local currency into foreign currency, at the unrealistic – and hence all the more attractive – official rate.
According to another local analyst, who also preferred anonymity, “when CBE officials saw the effect that the arbitrage situation was having on foreign-currency reserves, they claimed that people were abusing the system.” The CBE, he said, on June 27, in cooperation with the Capital Market Authority, issued new, ad hoc regulations to counter the problem: “If you could prove that your transaction was conducted by normal methods [i.e. not via arbitrage], you could get your money right away. Otherwise, you would have to wait until the money was available, or you might not get it at all.”

The ultimate deterrent
While rattling the CBE, the arbitrage fad had the positive – if temporary – effect of stimulating an otherwise moribund stock market. “The word of the day on the trading floor was ‘arbitrage’ – inspiring a flurry of trading in stocks with GDRs that carried market turnover up to £E 282.35 million,” read a May 15 market report from HC Brokerage. Judging from the day’s top 10 stocks in terms of turnover, traders appeared to be “maneuvering for gains from the interplay with the London Stock Exchange.” Companies with GDRs – particularly Commercial International Bank, Al Ahram Beverages, MIBank and Orascom Telecom – saw heavy trading, with total GDR trades on May 15 adding up to £E 33.92 million.
But the quickening of the market couldn’t last. The decision to freeze the CBE compensation account put GDRs back into a slumber and, furthermore, played havoc with Egypt’s reputation as a safe destination for investment. “The GDR market in London is dead now,” the first local analyst said. “The GDR market over the last two months is a trickle of what it used to be. There is no longer any point for foreigners to buy [Egyptian] GDRs, as they can no longer sell them locally.”
Whatever the CBE’s motivations, said Blair, “Current policies have to become far more pragmatic. If the CBE is in fact trying to restrict the movement of capital, that would be very bad for the market.”
According to the Beirut-based analyst, the move – coming after government vows to keep foreign currency available to institutional investors – represented “the ultimate deterrent for those foreign institutional investors who might still wish to enter the market.” Hopefully, now that the repatriation process has been restored, investors’ memories will be short.

Adam Morrow

Submit your comment

Top

   
         Site Developed and Maintained by the Business Information Center of AmCham Egypt
Copyright©2010 American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt